Home > multiplayer, strategy > A Top7 of Unique Units

A Top7 of Unique Units

November 16, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

It´s time for a good old list of “Top of Something” – in this case Unique Units (= UU) in Civilization 4: Beyond The Sword multiplayer. First of all, while the exact order might be subjective (and more for fun then serve a purpose 😉 ), I hope the arguments for why a specific unit is good at achieving something are logical and convincing.

There is some tendency towards early era units, but then again there are more of those in the game.

Remember, evaluating a unit´s strength has always to be connected to the game settings it´s supposed to be used in. So Jaguars don´t shine on Highlands nor do they so in a game where choking one opponent at the cost of your buildup will not win you the game since you are playing 7 other players at the same time.

7. Jaguar

jaguar

Unique unit for Aztec; Replaces Swordsman+10% city attack
Starts with Woodsman I
era actually used in: Ancient, some Classical

Jaguars are great for choking the opponent and controlling the area around your land. They have 2 moves on tiles that give them a lot of defense bonus and can be build so soon, that only the threat of them potentially coming makes getting and hooking metal the top priority for the players facing them – sometimes at the cost of hooking food or getting a better position for a second city.

6. Skirmisher

skirmisherUnique unit for Mali; Replaces Archer1-2 First Strikes
+50% city defense
+25% hills defense
era actually used in: Ancient

Skirmisher can be build without any ressource while making a choke with warriors and archers against the player building them basically impossible. On the other hand they can slow down or completely choke even more then one player during an ancient start teamer. That is because they have great odds on archers and warriors, especially flat both in offense and defense – so no additional action is required to have the dominating unit in terms of strength on the playing field during the early phase of the game while an opponent requires metal in order to fight them without getting slowed down too much – and even then it´s often a costly endevour freeing your land from skirmishes.

5. War Chariot

warchariotUnique unit for Egypt; Replaces ChariotImmune to First Strikes
Doesn’t receive defensive bonuses
Can withdraw from combat (10% chance)
+100% attack vs. Axemen
era actually used in: Ancient, Classical

War chariots have two moves and cost 20 hammers (quick speed) just like normal chariots, but have a strength of 5. That is an increase of base strength of 25%. Only the cataphract and the praetorian can keep up with that and the last one is more expensive then the unit it is based on, the swordsman (26 to 30 hammers). Unlike chariots warchariots can be build for a much longer period of time, adding to mass and the ability of 2 moves a decent strength which can combat even spears in 2 vs 1. Also warchariots come with animal husbandry, a very early researched technology, allowing for a kill or at least certain choking of a player who is left without metal at this point.

4. Panzer

panzerUnique unit for Germany; Replaces Tank
Doesn’t receive defensive bonuses
+50% vs. armored units
Starts with Blitz
era actually used in: Modern

Modern is all about fast moving stacks – especially including the ability to move quick around the opponent´s land. The unit for that is the tank, since it is the strongest available 2-mover in this era. You do build other stuff, but the tank is the unit of choice most of the time. The Panzer is a tank that additionaly gets an unreal bonus against tanks. ‘nough said.

3. Cataphract

cataphractUnique unit for Byzantium; Replaces Knight
Can flank attack catapults and trebuchets
Doesn’t receive defensive bonuses
era actually used in: Medieval, Renaissance

Knights dominate late medieval, early Renaissance and the Cataphract gets a bonus of 25% on the base strength of a normal Knight. That leaves it virtually without a counterunit. Both Elephants and Pikeman being the counter units to Knights don´t nearly have as good odds in defense or especially offense (pikeman) as other counter units with their favorite “prey” in other eras – and they both do not have 2 moves nor are the unit you preferably are building in late medieval, early Renaissance. Add to that a strategy that involves building tripple promoted cataphracts that have access to anti melee (= shock) or anti-horse (= formation) promotion and you get a unit that is so unbalanced compared to what else is available at its time like probably no other in the game.

2. Impi

impiUnique unit for Zulus; Replaces Spearman
+100% vs. Mounted Units
Starts with Mobility
era actually used in: Ancient, Classical, Medieval

Impis are spears with 2 moves. What doesn´t sound too spectacular at first is one of the most feared units in multiplayer civilization. For ancient that means that there is a unit out there, that can arrive in your land before you have planted a second city in order to get metal. It can be build with bronze from bronzeworking, which is almost always the first technology you research, it moves twice (almost) no matter what the terrain is and it gets defense bonus from terrain (forest etc.). Impis can take out or significantly slow down two or sometimes even three players – the presence of Zulu alone makes a difference in the way a team facing them has to plan out their game. After the early game harrassment Impis still can be used in surprise attacks due to their mobility promotion, but also during a bigger attack with sheer mass. That´s true for both ancient and classical, where the Impi is the best possible unique unit in most setups. In medieval they still are able to harass an opponent in many situations and afterwards in big masses are a pretty decent counterunit to Knights since 2 of them kill 1 Knight, even 1 Cataphract most of the time.

1. Fast Worker

fastworkerUnique unit for India; Replaces Worker
Can improve tiles
move range: 3
era actually used in: all eras

The fast worker is the dominating unit of later eras from Renaissance upwards. In modern and future it is a game defining factor, maybe even the biggest for those eras. Without it many super fast rush strategies wouldn´t be possible. That is due to its ability to save turns early on while chopping forest (move on it AND chop in 1 turn) and due to being able to move on forests/hills AND road them the same turn. Modern and Future start teamer without fast workers would look entirely different. In general in all eras fast workers are the best build up advantage you can get. An imperialistic India cannot be beat in its expansion, the difference to normal workers getting ridiculous in later eras. Also the fast worker shines in all game types multiplayer civilization has to offer, from solo games like duels, CTONS and Ironman games to teamers.

Honorable mentioning: (Aggressive) Praetorians

praetorianUnique unit for Rome; Replaces Swordsman
Strength 8 instead of 6.

Praetorians in “normal” status are good, sometimes great. They can be used nicely both in offense and defense. Early send out praetorians can slow down the opponent significantly, too. They require ironworking AND iron though and cost a (for early ancient) pretty painful 30 hammers, while an aggressive axeman with shock promotion has very good odds on them and requires only 23 hammers to be build. Still a great unit, useable throughout the entire game of an ancient or classical start game and even very playable in some medieval start strategies.

With restricted leaders the praetorian is not aggressive (both Roman leader don´t have the aggressive trait) hence has no easy (if any) access to shock promotion when spawning. Now with an aggressive leader the obstacles of setting up a running empire and only then becoming a threat are pretty much the same, but if that happens – there is no counter unit. Aggressive praetorians are the strongest possible unit regarding base strength civ has to offer in an ancient and most parts of a classical start. Even then though sitll not the best unit to have – just the strongest 😉

Advertisements
Categories: multiplayer, strategy Tags: , ,
  1. Moineau
    December 8, 2009 at 16:26

    I would have put the exact same order.Worst UU list time now i guess.

    • December 8, 2009 at 20:27

      That´s a great idea 😀

      Will enjoy doing that ^^

  2. Spyro
    December 11, 2009 at 19:04

    Jaguars can also be used in the early stage of a medi game till opponent succeed in connecting his metal/horse. Happened already twice I killed a guy with jags in medi.
    😀

  3. March 11, 2010 at 13:19

    Hi Fastmoves,

    I’ve seen you say more than once that knights are so important in their time. However, when playing with a strong economy, most certainly in FFA, I go for education as quickly as possible, than liberalism-nationalism-gunpowder-military tradition.
    This is very viable techpath, especially when first to discover liberalism. Even when playing strong players, I have had cavs in the field when they were building their first maces.

    You have any experience with this approach? When playing Liz, or Vic in Civ4 (I don’t play beyond the sword) it is almost a sure win.

    Thanks,
    Anthony

    • March 11, 2010 at 13:38

      Knights are the game defining factor in late Medieval and early-mid Renaissance teamer games. In 95% of long ffa or Ironman games they are NOT the way to go.

      You are absolutely right in your observations of how civ works, when you say that in FFA you quickly pass them. Actually waging war in an ffa/Ironman in medieval times with Knights is almost always a bad idea. It´s the time, where you are still building up your empire (in such games) and where you don´t want to attack one opponent (successfully), while your other opponents just do for example what you described. Finding the right time to attack in such games is an art in itself – but it can be said pretty easily that Knights are almost never the way to go. You´d have to interrupt expansion/cottage growth and you´d have to go along a shitty tech path.

      Those statements are true for both single and especially multiplayer games where you play 1v1v1vX.
      So long story short: You have a valid approach there 😉

      • March 11, 2010 at 20:11

        Hi Jobe,

        Thanks, you’re right, I sloppy reading on my part, but I’m still happy I brought it forward and that it merits your approval.

        I have studied your entire site and am quite impressed. It’s thoroughness and quality reminds me of the chess literature that I have been studying for the last 1,5 decade or so.

        I sure would be interested in playing you to sense your mastery!

  4. March 11, 2010 at 20:37

    I´ve started playing chess age 5. Once the battery of my cam is loaded, I´ll post a picture of my “library” regarding that 😉

    No coincidence I guess 😛

  5. Penny
    March 12, 2010 at 17:20

    While Jobe is right on the spot,

    It is worth mentioning you really need to differientate BTS from Warlords or Vanilla.
    The tech path in BTS is different, with Gundpowder & Military Trad, you “only” have access to cuirrassier (Horse with 12 strength); and need Rifling on top of that to get Cavs.
    While Cav are still a vey very effective unit, they are not anymore a must have game breaking turnaround. Hear me well, it STILL is one of the most (probabaly the most) logical High-tech unit to go for, just no where near Vanilla’s & WL standard. It’s actually a pretty good change, there is not a specifc game-breaking unit to go for anymore, Lighbulbing it’s way to Cav was just so overpowered together in the early version (Peter of russia comes to mind for a very focus lightbulb strategy).
    Cuirassier just fail to be anywhere as good, they really don’t behave the same in front of pikes & eles…And between 2 good players, Cavs now come after their counter : Rifles (note that Cavs counter better cavs, but that’s another story about 2 movers).

    That was grandpa input on the matter, about the Kinghts, Jobe is just simply right, just such a likely wrong way to go, perhaps Cataphracts could do it in Ironman/FFA, but then again, your stating the obvious and are going to face pikes everywhere and end up choking yourselves for not much.

  6. March 24, 2010 at 08:49

    This is Cody Vangilder

    Just like to start by telling you all

    Hi everyone, Admin and all staff. I hope to enjoy this forum and be an active member. I wish all the best and encourage you Admins

  1. December 9, 2009 at 00:41
  2. December 9, 2009 at 00:42

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: